BBN concordance

What's wrong (standard view): Five measurements agree on 26% DM.

ISST status

Current status: CONSISTENT

Five windows see same Omega_m = 0.316 from one mechanism: (1+f) baryons + Psi scaffolding in 84/16 split. CMB peak heights, BAO, lensing, clustering, BBN abundances all measure the same effective matter density. Not five coincidences — one quantity.

Source

Where this is documented

ISST.md 3, 7.6

This is an auto-summary of the canon entry. The full derivation lives in the referenced section of the lab's manuscript and working notes; a hand-enriched page may be added here in a later pass.

What would prove this wrong

Kill conditions

Per-problem kill conditions are recorded with each derivation in the ISST manuscript. The site-wide kill conditions (right-hand sidebar) cover the framework-level commitments that, if violated, would invalidate all DISSOLVED and PARTIAL claims simultaneously.