Layer 3 · the derivation · Galaxy rotation curves
Galaxy rotation curves — Branch-A Poisson → SPARC fit
Modified Poisson equation from F01 in the weak-field limit, regularised at the Newton-limit acceleration. Tested against 175 SPARC galaxies (F120).
Result — demonstrated, not derived
(1+f)-modified Poisson reproduces 175 SPARC galaxies with median RMS 13.8 km/s; on the Q=1 sub-sample (99 galaxies) ISST beats MOND.
The enhancement mechanism (the factor 4/3 from F01) is first-principles. The interpolation S(a) that smoothly connects the Newton limit to the ISST limit is phenomenological — two parameters fit, not derived.
F120 full SPARC 175: ISST median RMS 13.8 km/s · MOND 12.7 km/s · ISST wins on Q=1 sub-sample (99 galaxies, ISST 12.1 vs MOND 13.3)
Start from F01 in the weak-field, static-source limit
Take the F01 action, expand the field equations to leading order in Φ/c² for a static, spherically symmetric source. The conservation identity for the Ψ-equation produces the factor 4/3 in front of (1+f) ρb. The correction has been confirmed unchanged by the F130b path-ζ framework.
Frameworks consulted
- ALLOWED·F01 modified Poisson
- DENIED·Standard Poisson[matter_coupling_universal=false]
Read off circular velocity
For a galaxy whose baryonic mass distribution is known from photometry plus a stellar mass-to-light ratio, the standard prediction Vbar²(R) is enhanced by (4/3)(1+fp)(1+fs). With fp = 5.664 (the universal primordial enhancement from A05/F59), the asymptotic flat-curve prediction is set; the radial profile of fs(R) is what couples the local processing history of the stellar/gas content to the rotation curve.
Frameworks consulted
- ALLOWED·Baryonic Tully-Fisher relation
- WARNING·MOND interpolation[different mechanism, similar phenomenology]
Newton-limit regulator (phenomenological)
To match the Newton-limit (no enhancement at high acceleration, e.g. inside the solar system) and the ISST limit (full enhancement at low acceleration, e.g. galaxy outskirts), the v8 formula introduces a sigmoidal regulator S(x) with acrit ≈ cH0/(2π) ≈ 1.0 × 10⁻¹⁰ m/s² (the only natural acceleration scale in the cosmology). Two parameters are fit to the SPARC ensemble: a0 = 0.0075 × 10⁻¹⁰ m/s² (full 175 optimum) and q = 0.45. This is the honest gap: deriving a0 and q from the underlying structural-index physics is the open problem F120 explicitly disclaims.
Frameworks consulted
- WARNING·v8 phenomenological regulator[two free parameters: a_0, q]
- DENIED·First-principles closure[open — full f_s(R, T) profile not yet derived]
Apply to SPARC 175
On the full SPARC 175-galaxy benchmark, the v8 ISST formula is competitive with MOND: ISST wins on 86 of 175 galaxies; on the high-quality Q=1 sub-sample (99 galaxies), ISST gives 12.1 km/s vs MOND 13.3 km/s. On the 14-galaxy 2019 Lelli benchmark, ISST 10.2 vs MOND 12.4, with ISST winning 10/14. The Baryonic Tully-Fisher slope from this fit is 1.15 (literature: 1.0 ± 0.1).
Frameworks consulted
- ALLOWED·SPARC photometric inputs
- ALLOWED·Stellar mass-to-light fit
What this denies, and what it doesn't
The rotation-curve fit does not require any non-baryonic mass component. The same (1+f) coupling that drives this fit is the one that the engine surfaces as denyingNFW-halo and WIMP frameworks. ISST and MOND are observationally close here but distinguishable on cluster scales (where ISST's structural-index dependence matters and MOND's pure acceleration scale doesn't).
Frameworks consulted
- DENIED·NFW dark-matter halo[dark_matter_halo_ontology=false]
- DENIED·WIMP cold dark matter[dark_matter_particles_exist=false]
- DENIED·Warm dark matter[dark_matter_particles_exist=false]
- WARNING·MOND (a₀ tuning)[phenomenologically similar — distinguishable on cluster scales]